Good, Bad and Downright Ugly KPIsby Stacey Barr |
Before you can successfully find good performance measures, you have to know what a good measure is. Sometimes it’s easier to start by defining what ugly performance measures are, because the flipside of what makes a measure ugly helps you define what makes a measure good.
These are examples I gathered from various businesses and organisations of so-called measures for a customer service goal. They are all ugly performance measures:
“Win Customer Service Award”
Winning an award is an event. Good performance measures aren’t events. They are regular, ongoing, actionable feedback about the result you’re trying to improve. Besides, any customer service award worth its salt would ask you how you measure your customer service performance and use those measures as part of the criteria for judging if you deserve the award.
“Implement Customer Relationship Management by June 2011”
Implementing something by a due date is a milestone. Milestone achievement is simply evidence of an action, not a performance result. And like winning an award, they don’t give regular and ongoing feedback that’s actionable. Milestones are useful for project management, but they’re not good measures for performance management.
Staff productivity is evidence of how productive staff are, not of what the customer is experiencing. Can’t you imagine how staff productivity could improve, but at the expense of customer service? And how customer service might improve but staff productivity remain unchanged or be even worse? It’s an ugly measure because it’s just not in any way relevant evidence of the result.
Customer Loyalty is too ambiguous to be a good measure. There is not a universal standard for how to calculate a measure called Customer Loyalty. Loyalty means different things to different people: retention, lifetime value, referral, % share of pocket, etc… Vague labels that stand alone like this don’t make good performance measures.
A survey is a data collection method, not a measure. A customer survey collects a lot of data, data that could be used for a wide variety of potential performance measures. Perhaps this is why surveys are usually too long and not useful: people don’t define the measures before working out the data they need and the best way to collect it.
“Customers prefer us over our competitors”
This is a performance result, not a measure. It’s describing a state we’d like to achieve, to be preferred by our customers compared to our competitors. But it’s not describing how this would be quantified. Yes, it can be quantified, maybe by something like the dollar amount customers spend with us as a proportion of what they spend with our competitors.
Connect with Stacey
Haven’t found what you’re looking for? Want more information? Fill out the form below and I’ll get in touch with you as soon as possible.